Many RFx events in the technology management space are broken before they even begin. Blind RFPs with unclear budgets, generic templates, and minimal discovery create frustration for buyers and vendors, consume enormous time, and still produce poor-fit selections. In TEM and mobility specifically, misused RFIs and RFPs directly contribute to commoditization and dissatisfaction on both sides.
The first fix is clarity of intent. Before sending anything to the market, stakeholders must agree on the true goals and objectives: lowest short-term cost, long-term partnership, innovation, risk reduction, or a mix of these. That intent should be clearly communicated in RFx documentation and scoring criteria so vendors can respond with aligned solutions. When intent is fuzzy, responses tend to be generic and difficult to differentiate.
Second, separate discovery from selection. Too many RFPs launch with little to no preliminary conversation, which forces vendors to answer in the abstract. Using an initial RFI or short qualification phase to explore use cases, current-state pain points, and desired outcomes leads to more targeted RFPs. Live working sessions rather than email-only interactions help both parties test assumptions and avoid misalignment.
Third, design RFx documents that reflect the realities of modern TEM and IT services. Spreadsheets with hundreds of line items often reward whoever is best at filling forms, not best at delivering outcomes. Instead, include scenario-based questions (“Show us how you would handle X”), day-in-the-life workflow descriptions, and specific data-quality expectations. Ask directly about ownership structure, private equity involvement, roadmap, and how the provider manages change, including M&A events.
Evaluation should balance quantitative scoring with qualitative judgment. Price is important, but it should not eclipse service quality, cultural fit, and the provider’s willingness to co-own risk and results. Include stakeholders from finance, operations, security, and end-user groups in the process so the selected partner can support the broader enterprise, not just a single sponsor.
Finally, close the loop. Whether or not a provider is selected, sharing high-level feedback improves future responses and strengthens market relationships. Over time, better-designed RFx events reduce wasted effort, surface better-aligned partners, and shift the TEM and IT services market away from transactional bidding toward outcome-based collaboration.
Interested in learning how your peers tackle this topic? Become a Professional Member today (it’s FREE to join!)
